July 4, 2008
What’s the difference between being smart and being stupid?
I would have to state that acting on impulse; acting on one’s emotions, is probably not the best approach to problem solving. And what happens when one continues to act on impulse despite the best known consequences? They’re probably entering into the ignorance zone. I think the famous saying goes: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result each time.”
In closely examining the matter, it may be fitting to ask: why does one continue to do stupid things; what makes them ignore the price that comes with acting on the impulse that drives them so? Maybe I’m going out on a limb here, but I suspect the ego is playing a big part of this stupidity business. The sooner one learns to adapt, rather than having the world meld to their plan, the less and less stupid they become.
So for those who, to all appearances, appear to have things going for themselves, who appear truly happy, these are the ones who have lost the desire to satisfy their ego. Life isn’t about them anymore, thus they are making decisions that satisfy others as well as themselves. They have reached the state of mind where having their own way isn’t that important, and are able to cope with the results of whatever outcome should arise.
Where do the innate differences in disposition arise from? Why are some people selfish and arrogant, and others sensible and mature? Chance and even genetics may play a role in many cases, but don’t be misguided; parenting technique is of vital importance in the outcome of a person’s personality.
Authoritarian parenting is where the children are reared with an iron fist. They are often scared and suspicious: for girls, they internalize the emotional dilemma, while boys will externalize their emotions; for the boys, often this externalization will lead to a selfish disposition.
Permissive parenting is when the parent allows the child to run the show. These types are susceptible to the deepest, most utter form of selfishness possible, and unfortunately, the insatiable appetite for the child to have their own way is impossible to satisfy, thus not only creating unhappiness, but laying down the path to inner disquietude and an inability to function in the world.
Sometimes a mixture of these types of parenting will unite; a passive, co-dependent woman may fall for a man who is dominant and over-bearing. The resulting children of these types of parents is utter disaster. On the one hand, they are being overly spoiled and spoon fed by a mother who is afraid set the bar straight, and when the father comes home, fear ensues causing a warping of cognitive and emotional formation that is indescribable. This clash of identities carries long into later life.
Authoriative parenting, if one can manage, and is lucky enough to have knowledge of, is the best plan providing unlucky chance does not obscure the process. An authoritative parent will set guidelines for the child, but often will express a willingness to compromise in many situations, thus allowing the child a chance think for themselves by providing an understanding that the parent is not always out to get them. This isn’t exactly a democracy, but rather, a way of introducing the child into a world whose key component to success is the ability to learn how to work with others.












